EU Con Jure

Recently, I decided to take up studying EU constitutional law theory to get clear on the mechanisms again. I started where I had left off as a EU jurist many years ago: the draft constitution of the EU that got shot down by the people of France and Holland. I started to feel pretty good about seeing through some of the misinformation in the articles I was reading. Knowledge of the pillars and law structure came in handy to shift through the pretense of legitimacy. Reading the material, I rested assured that there was no way the UK could exit the first pillar to find its peril.

Then the Brexit referendum happened and the prick minister announced his resignation. That is, he will not resign until he is done with whatever he is really doing but not telling. Typical, but it was probably according to plan anyway. As long as Britain could not Brexit, it meant nothing to me. I took my time to look at article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty and understood that the people really do not have a say in it. It is the State that first has to decide, and then the EU gets to decide as if a State. Nowhere is there any room for people – or any government aligned with the people – to have a say on what UK or EU, is to decide. Continue reading

Advertisements

The Law Is Whatever They Make of It

Is it any use to complain about biased laws? Is it any use to complain about unjust judges? Is it any use to complain about greedy lawyers? And, is it any use to complain about ignorant clients?

If the people who made and use their System to their own benefit, have no need for justice for the people that they govern, then it is no use to complain about the System. Any change they make, is to further benefit them, not us. It says so in the first chapter of Plato’s Republic. A just man takes the words to mean that it does not pay to be unjust. Whereas an unjust man takes the words to mean that there is no limit to Continue reading